Light is both—a wave and a particle. Huygens’ wave theory and Newton’s particle theory clashed for centuries until Einstein’s photoelectric effect showed light behaves as photons, confirming its dual nature
Headlines
Is light a particle or a wave?
From the farthest stars to the screen in front of you, light is all around us. But the true nature of light and how it travels has been a mystery for centuries. One question that has confounded scientists from Isaac Newton to Albert Einstein is: Is light a particle or a wave?
“Whether light is a particle or a wave is a very old question,” said Riccardo Sapienza, a physicist at Imperial College London. “As a species, we are driven to understand the fundamental nature of the world around us, and this particular puzzle kept 19th-century scientists occupied.”
Today, we know the answer: Light is both a particle and a wave. But how did scientists arrive at this mind-bending conclusion?
The journey began by distinguishing between waves and particles. “You would describe an object as a particle if you can identify it as a point in space,” Sapienza explained. “A wave, on the other hand, is something that isn’t defined as a point and is characterized by its frequency of oscillation and the distance between its maximum and minimum
The first conclusive evidence of light’s wave nature came in 1801, when Thomas Young conducted his famous double-slit experiment. By placing a screen with two slits in front of a light source, Young observed the light’s behavior after passing through the slits. What appeared on the wall was a complex pattern of bright and dark bands, known as interference fringes.
As the light waves passed through the slits, they spread out spherically and interacted with each other, either reinforcing or canceling each other out, which created the interference pattern.
“If light were a particle, you would have just seen two bright spots on the other side of the screen,” explained Sapienza. “But instead, we see a pattern of light everywhere behind the screen, not just at the position of the slits. This is clear proof that light behaves as a wave
Eighty-six years after Thomas Young’s discovery of light’s wave nature, Heinrich Hertz demonstrated the particle nature of light. He observed that when ultraviolet light struck a metal surface, it generated an electrical charge—a phenomenon known as the photoelectric effect. However, the full significance of his discovery wasn’t understood until much later.
According to classical physics, shining light on atoms should give electrons enough energy to escape from the atom, with brighter light causing electrons to escape more quickly. But in subsequent experiments, some surprising results contradicted this theory.
It was Albert Einstein who solved the puzzle in 1905, earning a Nobel Prize for his work in 1921. He proposed that light doesn’t behave like a continuous wave; instead, it consists of discrete packets of energy called photons. This explained peculiar observations, such as the existence of a cutoff frequency, where no electrons are ejected below a certain light frequency, no matter how intense the light is.
So, what determines whether light behaves like a wave or a particle? According to Sapienza, this is the wrong question. “Light is not sometimes a particle and sometimes a wave,” he explained. “It is always both—a wave and a particle. The properties we observe depend on the experiment.”
In everyday life, light behaves more like a wave, and this form is most useful for manipulation in fields like optics. For instance, researchers use metamaterials—materials shaped to interact with light in specific ways—to enhance light-material interactions. These materials can improve solar energy absorption or create more effective MRI probes.
However, light’s dual nature is essential to understanding the universe. This wave-particle duality also applies to other quantum particles, like electrons. “If you remove the particle nature, you remove the fact that electrons have specific energy states, and atoms couldn’t be stable,” Sapienza said. “Without this quantum property, life as we know it couldn’t exist